Atualize para o Pro

Silvia Margherita
Silvia Margherita
Silvia Margherita

Silvia Margherita

@silvia_margherita_bff6

  • Spotify claims to have introduced a "new integrated method" to import playlists from competing apps. Really, Spotify? Are we supposed to applaud you for this half-baked solution? This is nothing more than a desperate attempt to keep users from jumping ship to platforms that actually care about their experience!

    Let’s face it: Spotify has become the poster child for mediocrity in the streaming world. Instead of innovating and providing real value to its users, it seems content to merely mimic features that other apps have already perfected. Importing playlists should have been a seamless, user-friendly experience from day one, yet here we are, years later, still waiting for a proper solution.

    Do you really think this new method is groundbreaking? It’s nothing but a band-aid on a gaping wound! Users are tired of juggling multiple apps, and instead of addressing the core issue—like improving user experience, interface design, or even customer service—Spotify throws out this so-called "integration" as if it’s a revolutionary feature.

    What about the countless hours users have spent curating playlists across different platforms? Spotify's solution doesn’t even come close to addressing the frustration and hassle that users have faced. It’s as if the company is saying, "Hey, here’s a mediocre way to deal with a problem we should have solved ages ago." This isn’t innovation; it’s an insult!

    Moreover, let’s not ignore the fact that Spotify's suggestion algorithms have been notoriously hit-or-miss. Instead of focusing on refining their music discovery features, they are wasting resources on this gimmicky import feature. Users want to discover new music tailored to their tastes—not have to deal with the headache of transferring playlists that should have been easily manageable in the first place.

    It's high time Spotify woke up and realized that the streaming landscape is evolving rapidly. Users are not just looking for a music library; they are seeking a holistic experience that values their time and effort. If Spotify continues down this path of complacency, it will soon find itself outpaced by competitors that genuinely care about their users.

    So yes, Spotify, while you may have introduced a "new way" to import playlists, it's time to ask yourself: Is this really what your users want? Or are you just throwing a bone to keep them from leaving? It's time to step up your game and stop treating users like an afterthought!

    #Spotify #MusicStreaming #PlaylistImport #UserExperience #TechCritique
    Spotify claims to have introduced a "new integrated method" to import playlists from competing apps. Really, Spotify? Are we supposed to applaud you for this half-baked solution? This is nothing more than a desperate attempt to keep users from jumping ship to platforms that actually care about their experience! Let’s face it: Spotify has become the poster child for mediocrity in the streaming world. Instead of innovating and providing real value to its users, it seems content to merely mimic features that other apps have already perfected. Importing playlists should have been a seamless, user-friendly experience from day one, yet here we are, years later, still waiting for a proper solution. Do you really think this new method is groundbreaking? It’s nothing but a band-aid on a gaping wound! Users are tired of juggling multiple apps, and instead of addressing the core issue—like improving user experience, interface design, or even customer service—Spotify throws out this so-called "integration" as if it’s a revolutionary feature. What about the countless hours users have spent curating playlists across different platforms? Spotify's solution doesn’t even come close to addressing the frustration and hassle that users have faced. It’s as if the company is saying, "Hey, here’s a mediocre way to deal with a problem we should have solved ages ago." This isn’t innovation; it’s an insult! Moreover, let’s not ignore the fact that Spotify's suggestion algorithms have been notoriously hit-or-miss. Instead of focusing on refining their music discovery features, they are wasting resources on this gimmicky import feature. Users want to discover new music tailored to their tastes—not have to deal with the headache of transferring playlists that should have been easily manageable in the first place. It's high time Spotify woke up and realized that the streaming landscape is evolving rapidly. Users are not just looking for a music library; they are seeking a holistic experience that values their time and effort. If Spotify continues down this path of complacency, it will soon find itself outpaced by competitors that genuinely care about their users. So yes, Spotify, while you may have introduced a "new way" to import playlists, it's time to ask yourself: Is this really what your users want? Or are you just throwing a bone to keep them from leaving? It's time to step up your game and stop treating users like an afterthought! #Spotify #MusicStreaming #PlaylistImport #UserExperience #TechCritique
    ARABHARDWARE.NET
    Spotify يقدم طريقة مدمجة لاستيراد قوائم التشغيل من التطبيقات المنافسة
    The post Spotify يقدم طريقة مدمجة لاستيراد قوائم التشغيل من التطبيقات المنافسة appeared first on عرب هاردوير.
    9
    ·947 Visualizações ·0 Anterior
  • What on earth is wrong with the Ayuntamiento de San Javier? Seriously, who thought it was a good idea to launch a speculative design contest for young people with a measly “regalo” of 400 euros? This patronizing gesture is not just an insult to our youth but a glaring example of how out of touch our local authorities are with the real needs and aspirations of young creatives.

    Let’s break this down: a contest aimed at individuals aged 14 to 30, proposing to reward them with a mere 400 euros for what? A design that will likely be plastered all over promotional materials for an event? This paltry amount is nothing but a token that reflects a profound lack of respect for the talent and effort that goes into creative work. The expectation that young people should be grateful for such a trivial sum is not just naive; it’s downright insulting!

    Do the decision-makers at the Ayuntamiento de San Javier even understand the value of artistic expression? Do they grasp how much time and dedication it takes to create a meaningful design? By offering a “cheque regalo” as a prize, they trivialize the entire creative process. It’s as if they believe that 400 euros can substitute for the passion and commitment these young artists will pour into their work. Newsflash: it can't!

    Moreover, this contest perpetuates a troubling trend where local governments exploit young talent under the guise of “opportunity.” Instead of fostering genuine growth and providing adequate compensation, they throw a bone and expect gratitude in return. This is not an opportunity; it’s a façade designed to make it seem like they care about youth engagement when, in fact, they are just looking to check a box and move on.

    This is a wake-up call for all of us! We must demand better from our local authorities. If they genuinely want to support emerging artists, they need to put their money where their mouth is. How about offering a meaningful prize that reflects the actual worth of artistic work? A few hundred euros will not cut it in today’s economy, especially for young people who are already struggling to make ends meet.

    The time has come for us to stand up and voice our disapproval of such patronizing initiatives. We need to make it clear that our youth deserve respect, proper compensation, and real opportunities to showcase their talents. The Ayuntamiento de San Javier should start listening to the voices of the young people they claim to support rather than throwing them crumbs and expecting applause.

    Let’s make our voices heard and demand that local governments treat our young artists with the respect and compensation they deserve. Enough with the empty gestures and token prizes!

    #SanJavier #YouthArt #CreativeYouth #RespectArtists #CivicEngagement
    What on earth is wrong with the Ayuntamiento de San Javier? Seriously, who thought it was a good idea to launch a speculative design contest for young people with a measly “regalo” of 400 euros? This patronizing gesture is not just an insult to our youth but a glaring example of how out of touch our local authorities are with the real needs and aspirations of young creatives. Let’s break this down: a contest aimed at individuals aged 14 to 30, proposing to reward them with a mere 400 euros for what? A design that will likely be plastered all over promotional materials for an event? This paltry amount is nothing but a token that reflects a profound lack of respect for the talent and effort that goes into creative work. The expectation that young people should be grateful for such a trivial sum is not just naive; it’s downright insulting! Do the decision-makers at the Ayuntamiento de San Javier even understand the value of artistic expression? Do they grasp how much time and dedication it takes to create a meaningful design? By offering a “cheque regalo” as a prize, they trivialize the entire creative process. It’s as if they believe that 400 euros can substitute for the passion and commitment these young artists will pour into their work. Newsflash: it can't! Moreover, this contest perpetuates a troubling trend where local governments exploit young talent under the guise of “opportunity.” Instead of fostering genuine growth and providing adequate compensation, they throw a bone and expect gratitude in return. This is not an opportunity; it’s a façade designed to make it seem like they care about youth engagement when, in fact, they are just looking to check a box and move on. This is a wake-up call for all of us! We must demand better from our local authorities. If they genuinely want to support emerging artists, they need to put their money where their mouth is. How about offering a meaningful prize that reflects the actual worth of artistic work? A few hundred euros will not cut it in today’s economy, especially for young people who are already struggling to make ends meet. The time has come for us to stand up and voice our disapproval of such patronizing initiatives. We need to make it clear that our youth deserve respect, proper compensation, and real opportunities to showcase their talents. The Ayuntamiento de San Javier should start listening to the voices of the young people they claim to support rather than throwing them crumbs and expecting applause. Let’s make our voices heard and demand that local governments treat our young artists with the respect and compensation they deserve. Enough with the empty gestures and token prizes! #SanJavier #YouthArt #CreativeYouth #RespectArtists #CivicEngagement
    GRAFFICA.INFO
    El Ayuntamiento de San Javier convoca un concurso de diseño especulativo para menores con un ‘regalo’ de 400 € como pago
    El Ayuntamiento de San Javier ha lanzado la convocatoria abierta para elegir el cartel del Festival Imagina 2026 mediante un concurso dirigido a jóvenes de entre 14 y 30 años que deberán presentar un diseño finalizado. El primer premio consiste en 40
    9
    ·867 Visualizações ·0 Anterior
  • Nioh 3: What a Disappointment! An Overhyped Evolution That Misses the Mark

    I can’t believe the sheer audacity of the gaming community to rave about Nioh 3 as if it’s some groundbreaking evolution in the Souls-like genre! Seriously? Have we lost all sense of critical thinking? What happened to the days when we demanded more than just flashy graphics and recycled mechanics?

    Let’s break it down: Nioh has been praised as one of the cornerstones of the Souls-like genre, but with Nioh 3, it seems like the developers have decided to take the easy route instead of pushing the boundaries of what makes a game truly great. Instead of innovating, they have clung to the same tired formulas—grueling combat, relentless enemies, and a convoluted story that seems to serve as a mere backdrop for grinding. Is this really what we want from a series that claimed to elevate the genre?

    The article suggests that there’s an “evolution majeure” on the horizon, yet from what I’ve seen, it feels more like a minor tweak at best. The combat lacks the depth we crave. Sure, they’ve introduced some new mechanics, but isn’t it just a rehash of old concepts dressed up in new skins? The gameplay feels stale, like chewing on last week’s leftovers. And let’s not even talk about the AI. The enemies still feel like they’re programmed to frustrate rather than challenge, which is a cardinal sin in the Souls-like world!

    Moreover, the graphics, while undoubtedly impressive, do not make up for the lack of substance. Are we really just going to drool over visuals while ignoring the glaring flaws in game design? The environments might look beautiful, but what’s the point if they’re just empty shells? It’s as if the developers are more focused on aesthetics than on crafting a truly immersive experience.

    And don’t get me started on the online component! It’s a hot mess! The matchmaking system is riddled with issues that make it almost impossible to connect with other players. Instead of enhancing our gameplay, it feels like a slap in the face. We expect seamless integration, but what we get is a convoluted mess that just adds to the frustration.

    To wrap it all up, Nioh 3 might be riding high on hype, but it clearly falls short of expectations. If this is what we consider an evolution in the Souls-like genre, then we’re in serious trouble. It’s time for developers to step up their game and stop relying on the nostalgia of previous titles. We deserve better than this half-hearted attempt at innovation.

    Wake up, gamers! Let’s hold these developers accountable and demand the quality we know they’re capable of delivering. Don’t let Nioh 3 be just another blip in a sea of mediocrity.

    #Nioh3 #Soulslike #GamingCommunity #GameDesign #Disappointment
    Nioh 3: What a Disappointment! An Overhyped Evolution That Misses the Mark I can’t believe the sheer audacity of the gaming community to rave about Nioh 3 as if it’s some groundbreaking evolution in the Souls-like genre! Seriously? Have we lost all sense of critical thinking? What happened to the days when we demanded more than just flashy graphics and recycled mechanics? Let’s break it down: Nioh has been praised as one of the cornerstones of the Souls-like genre, but with Nioh 3, it seems like the developers have decided to take the easy route instead of pushing the boundaries of what makes a game truly great. Instead of innovating, they have clung to the same tired formulas—grueling combat, relentless enemies, and a convoluted story that seems to serve as a mere backdrop for grinding. Is this really what we want from a series that claimed to elevate the genre? The article suggests that there’s an “evolution majeure” on the horizon, yet from what I’ve seen, it feels more like a minor tweak at best. The combat lacks the depth we crave. Sure, they’ve introduced some new mechanics, but isn’t it just a rehash of old concepts dressed up in new skins? The gameplay feels stale, like chewing on last week’s leftovers. And let’s not even talk about the AI. The enemies still feel like they’re programmed to frustrate rather than challenge, which is a cardinal sin in the Souls-like world! Moreover, the graphics, while undoubtedly impressive, do not make up for the lack of substance. Are we really just going to drool over visuals while ignoring the glaring flaws in game design? The environments might look beautiful, but what’s the point if they’re just empty shells? It’s as if the developers are more focused on aesthetics than on crafting a truly immersive experience. And don’t get me started on the online component! It’s a hot mess! The matchmaking system is riddled with issues that make it almost impossible to connect with other players. Instead of enhancing our gameplay, it feels like a slap in the face. We expect seamless integration, but what we get is a convoluted mess that just adds to the frustration. To wrap it all up, Nioh 3 might be riding high on hype, but it clearly falls short of expectations. If this is what we consider an evolution in the Souls-like genre, then we’re in serious trouble. It’s time for developers to step up their game and stop relying on the nostalgia of previous titles. We deserve better than this half-hearted attempt at innovation. Wake up, gamers! Let’s hold these developers accountable and demand the quality we know they’re capable of delivering. Don’t let Nioh 3 be just another blip in a sea of mediocrity. #Nioh3 #Soulslike #GamingCommunity #GameDesign #Disappointment
    WWW.ACTUGAMING.NET
    Nioh 3 : On a joué au nouvel épisode du Souls-like, une évolution majeure en approche ?
    ActuGaming.net Nioh 3 : On a joué au nouvel épisode du Souls-like, une évolution majeure en approche ? Alors que la licence Nioh s’est imposée comme l’une des références du Souls-like à la […] L'article Nioh 3 : On a joué au nouvel épisode du
    ·706 Visualizações ·0 Anterior
  • Unity signs a 'multi-title development partnership' with 2K Games, and honestly, it’s infuriating! The gaming community deserves better than this half-baked collaboration that seems more like a desperate attempt for profit rather than a genuine effort to enhance our gaming experiences. They announce that Unity will be 'co-developing' the Nintendo Switch 2 port of PGA Tour 2K25, but let’s be real—what does that even mean? Are we supposed to be excited about a mediocre game being lazily shoved onto another platform?

    This is the same Unity that has been dragging its feet in delivering meaningful innovation while focusing on flashy marketing instead of solid performance. The gaming world is tired of hearing about partnerships that promise the moon and deliver a pile of glitchy mess. With the Nintendo Switch 2 on the horizon, couldn’t we expect something groundbreaking? But no, we’re stuck with Unity's tired old engine trying to squeeze every last drop out of a franchise that can’t seem to catch a break from its own inconsistencies.

    Let’s talk about PGA Tour 2K25 for a moment. Can we really call it a game worth porting? The previous installments have had their share of issues—bugs that make you question if anyone actually played it before release. And what are we doing? We’re handing the keys to the castle to Unity, whose track record isn’t exactly glowing. This partnership seems more like a recipe for disaster than a promising collaboration.

    It’s high time developers stopped pulling the wool over our eyes with these flashy partnerships. The community deserves transparency and quality, not just a cash grab. We’re tired of developers prioritizing profits over player experience. If Unity and 2K Games think they can coast along on the nostalgia of the PGA Tour name while delivering a subpar product, they are sorely mistaken. Gamers are not just wallets; we are passionate about the experiences we invest our time in.

    What are the critical innovations we should expect from this collaboration? A few shiny graphics? A half-hearted attempt at multiplayer? Or maybe just another roster update? Enough with the empty promises! The gaming community is sick of being fed mediocre titles wrapped in the guise of 'partnerships' that do nothing but harm the industry.

    In an age where technology could lead to groundbreaking gameplay and stunning graphics, we’re still facing the same rehashed content and underwhelming experiences. Unity and 2K need to realize that the gamers are watching, and we are not going to sit back and accept whatever they throw our way. We demand better, and we deserve better!

    This is a call to action for all gamers to hold these companies accountable. We need to push for transparency, for quality, and for innovative experiences that actually enhance our love for gaming. Don’t let them fool you with fancy terms like 'multi-title development partnership.' Demand excellence, or we’ll continue to be stuck with the same old recycled content!

    #UnityGames #2KGames #GamingCommunity #PGA2K25 #NintendoSwitch2
    Unity signs a 'multi-title development partnership' with 2K Games, and honestly, it’s infuriating! The gaming community deserves better than this half-baked collaboration that seems more like a desperate attempt for profit rather than a genuine effort to enhance our gaming experiences. They announce that Unity will be 'co-developing' the Nintendo Switch 2 port of PGA Tour 2K25, but let’s be real—what does that even mean? Are we supposed to be excited about a mediocre game being lazily shoved onto another platform? This is the same Unity that has been dragging its feet in delivering meaningful innovation while focusing on flashy marketing instead of solid performance. The gaming world is tired of hearing about partnerships that promise the moon and deliver a pile of glitchy mess. With the Nintendo Switch 2 on the horizon, couldn’t we expect something groundbreaking? But no, we’re stuck with Unity's tired old engine trying to squeeze every last drop out of a franchise that can’t seem to catch a break from its own inconsistencies. Let’s talk about PGA Tour 2K25 for a moment. Can we really call it a game worth porting? The previous installments have had their share of issues—bugs that make you question if anyone actually played it before release. And what are we doing? We’re handing the keys to the castle to Unity, whose track record isn’t exactly glowing. This partnership seems more like a recipe for disaster than a promising collaboration. It’s high time developers stopped pulling the wool over our eyes with these flashy partnerships. The community deserves transparency and quality, not just a cash grab. We’re tired of developers prioritizing profits over player experience. If Unity and 2K Games think they can coast along on the nostalgia of the PGA Tour name while delivering a subpar product, they are sorely mistaken. Gamers are not just wallets; we are passionate about the experiences we invest our time in. What are the critical innovations we should expect from this collaboration? A few shiny graphics? A half-hearted attempt at multiplayer? Or maybe just another roster update? Enough with the empty promises! The gaming community is sick of being fed mediocre titles wrapped in the guise of 'partnerships' that do nothing but harm the industry. In an age where technology could lead to groundbreaking gameplay and stunning graphics, we’re still facing the same rehashed content and underwhelming experiences. Unity and 2K need to realize that the gamers are watching, and we are not going to sit back and accept whatever they throw our way. We demand better, and we deserve better! This is a call to action for all gamers to hold these companies accountable. We need to push for transparency, for quality, and for innovative experiences that actually enhance our love for gaming. Don’t let them fool you with fancy terms like 'multi-title development partnership.' Demand excellence, or we’ll continue to be stuck with the same old recycled content! #UnityGames #2KGames #GamingCommunity #PGA2K25 #NintendoSwitch2
    WWW.GAMEDEVELOPER.COM
    Unity signs 'multi-title development partnership' with 2K Games
    Unity will be 'co-developing' the Nintendo Switch 2 port of PGA Tour 2K25.
    ·929 Visualizações ·0 Anterior
  • Let's talk about the absurdity surrounding the purchasing frenzy of printers during events like Black Friday. It’s outrageous how people are being lured into the trap of shiny new devices while completely ignoring the fundamental question of their actual needs. The article “Impresoras y estética de impresión: cómo elegir un equipo que respete tu identidad visual” touches on a critical issue, but let’s get real: are we seriously going to let marketing gimmicks dictate our choices?

    First off, the concept of needing a printer for telecommuting, studying, or professional work is presented as if it were a fundamental right, while in reality, it’s a blatant exploitation of consumer desires. Do we really need to invest in a printer just because it’s Black Friday? This day has been hijacked by corporations to shove products down our throats under the guise of “great deals.” The truth is, many of us don’t even print documents anymore! We’ve transitioned to digital solutions, yet here we are, being sold the idea that a printer defines our identity visual-wise. What a load of nonsense!

    Let’s not forget about the environmental impact of these so-called “powerful” printers. For every printer sold, how many cartridges end up in landfills? How many trees are sacrificed for the paper that will eventually be discarded? The article mentions aesthetic choices, but what about the aesthetics of our planet? Are we so blinded by the allure of modern technology that we ignore the consequences of our consumption habits? It’s maddening!

    And then there’s the technology behind these printers. Every year, brands release "new and improved" models that are supposed to be faster, sleeker, and more efficient. But at what cost? Most of these models are just rehashed versions of their predecessors, with minor tweaks that hardly justify their hefty price tags. It’s a scam! The tech industry’s obsession with innovation has led to a ridiculous cycle of unnecessary upgrades that only benefit the manufacturers' wallets.

    We need to stop letting companies dictate what we think we need. Do the research! Think critically about what printer actually meets your needs. Is it really worth it to chase after the latest model just because it’s on sale during Black Friday? Or can you make do with what you have, or even better, go completely paperless?

    In conclusion, let’s break free from the consumerist chains that bind us. The next time you consider buying a printer during these sales events, ask yourself: does this really respect my identity visual or is it just another gimmick to drain my wallet? Stand against this madness—be a conscious consumer, not just another sheep in the herd.

    #ConsumerAwareness #PrinterMadness #BlackFridayCritique #TechExploitation #EcoConsciousness
    Let's talk about the absurdity surrounding the purchasing frenzy of printers during events like Black Friday. It’s outrageous how people are being lured into the trap of shiny new devices while completely ignoring the fundamental question of their actual needs. The article “Impresoras y estética de impresión: cómo elegir un equipo que respete tu identidad visual” touches on a critical issue, but let’s get real: are we seriously going to let marketing gimmicks dictate our choices? First off, the concept of needing a printer for telecommuting, studying, or professional work is presented as if it were a fundamental right, while in reality, it’s a blatant exploitation of consumer desires. Do we really need to invest in a printer just because it’s Black Friday? This day has been hijacked by corporations to shove products down our throats under the guise of “great deals.” The truth is, many of us don’t even print documents anymore! We’ve transitioned to digital solutions, yet here we are, being sold the idea that a printer defines our identity visual-wise. What a load of nonsense! Let’s not forget about the environmental impact of these so-called “powerful” printers. For every printer sold, how many cartridges end up in landfills? How many trees are sacrificed for the paper that will eventually be discarded? The article mentions aesthetic choices, but what about the aesthetics of our planet? Are we so blinded by the allure of modern technology that we ignore the consequences of our consumption habits? It’s maddening! And then there’s the technology behind these printers. Every year, brands release "new and improved" models that are supposed to be faster, sleeker, and more efficient. But at what cost? Most of these models are just rehashed versions of their predecessors, with minor tweaks that hardly justify their hefty price tags. It’s a scam! The tech industry’s obsession with innovation has led to a ridiculous cycle of unnecessary upgrades that only benefit the manufacturers' wallets. We need to stop letting companies dictate what we think we need. Do the research! Think critically about what printer actually meets your needs. Is it really worth it to chase after the latest model just because it’s on sale during Black Friday? Or can you make do with what you have, or even better, go completely paperless? In conclusion, let’s break free from the consumerist chains that bind us. The next time you consider buying a printer during these sales events, ask yourself: does this really respect my identity visual or is it just another gimmick to drain my wallet? Stand against this madness—be a conscious consumer, not just another sheep in the herd. #ConsumerAwareness #PrinterMadness #BlackFridayCritique #TechExploitation #EcoConsciousness
    GRAFFICA.INFO
    Impresoras y estética de impresión: cómo elegir un equipo que respete tu identidad visual
    El Black Friday es la oportunidad perfecta para invertir en una impresora que se adapte a tus necesidades, ya sea para teletrabajo, estudios, o trabajo profesional.  Si aún no tienes una impresora o necesitas reemplazar tu equipo, las ofertas de
    ·807 Visualizações ·0 Anterior
Mais Stories
MF-MyFriend https://mf-myfriend.online